Proficiency Can Do Benchmarks from ACTFL.

I have a nice opportunity to dig into ACTFLs new proficiency can do benchmarks with colleagues in my district.  This is the kind of work I wish we had more time to do.  It’s hard to carve out the time among the craziness of being ready for the students walking through the door the next hour, but we must find time to do it so that we continue to improve.

I’m quickly discovering that my understanding of proficiency is weak in respect to the intermediate level.  Because most of our students will leave us within the intermediate range, my hope is to flush out that level as I consider the can do benchmarks.

The Novice Level Interpretive Communication Benchmark from the NCSSFL-ACTFL can do statements reads:

I can identify the general topic and some basic information in both very familiar and everyday contexts by recognizing practiced or memorized words, phrases, and simple sentences in texts that are spoken, written, or signed.

Notice the focus on familiar, practiced or memorized and simple.  Novice learners can understand things that they are working on currently when it is sheltered toward the novice learner.  This makes sense and in my experience happens quickly for students in a community of language learners.

The Intermediate Level Interpretive Communication Benchmark from the NCSSFL-ACTFL can do statements reads:

I can understand the main idea and some pieces of information on familiar topics from sentences and series of connected sentences within texts that are spoken, written, or signed.

An intermediate student upgrades from the general topic to the main idea.  Moving from basic information to some pieces of information seems quite similar to me.  The intermediate student continues in the familiar but instead of very familiar and everyday contexts we move to sentences and specifically connected sentences within texts.  As I flush this out in my own head I see 3 major differences between a novice student and an intermediate student.

  1. The intermediate student is able to isolate a main idea of a text opposed to having a simple and general idea.
  2. An intermediate student does not just rely on memorized and practiced words.  (I see this as recognizing familiar words that have not been the recent focus of instruction or communication.)
  3. The intermediate student is able to negotiate added meaning created from connected sentences.

It is clear that intermediate students are still operating in the familiar.  This leads me to consider that level 3 of any language program is critical.  Students start to be able to understand text, but once the message goes outside the familiar they revert to or at least feel like novice learners again.

As I look toward the next phase of my own learning about language learning and comprehensible input, a question about intermediate learners will drive my thoughts.

How do I construct a curriculum guide that will spiral back to familiar language for the intermediate learner?

What do you think?  How critical is the end of level 2 into level 3?  How do we stay in bounds with the familiar while offering learners opportunities to move forward?  Let me know what you think?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s